national health policy-making.
for this assignment you will write a policy paper. This second assignment adds up to the first assignment I have already complete it. my first assignment is almost 10 pages long. This second policy assignment is also about 10-12 pages long. SINCE I have already done most of the work in the first assignment you only have to add about 5 pages of policy research. My first assignment talks about cuba, and the human right violations that are occurings. It focuses most on the violation of freedom of speech and freedom of press. on the second assignment you have to talk about a solution to those human right violations. The solution that I thought of was the lifting of the US embargo, and how that would better the conditions of human rights in cuba, economically and with more access to technology. You have to extend on that!. BUT REMEMBER YOU HAVE TO FOCUS ON HOE LIFTING THE EMBARGO WILL HELP BETTER HUMAN RIGHTS IN CUBA< ESPECIALLY FREEDOM OF SPEACH. I have attach a lot of information for you to read on the embargo. I have also attached my first assignment for you to use it and introduce the policy in it. and most important I have attached the guidelines to the paper! also there is a human rights watch review to guide yourself on how to organize the paper.
MAKE THIS A GREAT PAPER
This assignment is designed to help students
understand the implications for nurses, nursing, national health policy-making, patient outcomes, and population health associated with the collection and use of Meaningful Use core criteria.
Provide an overview of the Meaningful Use program and an analysis of the implications for nurses, nursing, national health policy, patient outcomes, and population health associated with the collection and use of Meaningful Use core criteria. Recommend additional core criteria not presently identified for Meaningful Use collection in Stages 1 or 2 (lists of criteria may be found at cms.gov) that you feel would be beneficial for nurses, nursing, monitoring population health, setting national health policies, and/or improvements in patient outcomes or population health, providing your evidence for your recommendations. If you feel that no additional criteria are necessary, provide your evidence-based rationale for your argument. Conclude with insights gained from this assignment. A minimum of three outside scholarly resources are required—texts may be cited but are NOT included among the minimum of three outside scholarly resources.
Preparing the paper
1. Required texts may be used as references, but a minimum of three sources must be from outside course readings.
2. All aspects of the paper must be in APA format as expressed in the 6th edition.
3. The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) is 5–7 pages in length.
4. Ideas and information from professional sources must be cited correctly.